the one thing i’m most infuriated about was the reasoning behind not utilizing the oath as a method of eliminating an “enemy”. if the witch took the oath, the “dungeon” if it was one would have recognized the lack of an enemy to him as he would have only a subordinate. am i missing something or is he holding out on who to use it on in a life or death situation against someone who is a long term traveling companion?
the one thing i’m most infuriated about was the reasoning behind not utilizing the oath as a method of eliminating an “enemy”. if the witch took the oath, the “dungeon” if it was one would have recognized the lack of an enemy to him as he would have only a subordinate. am i missing something or is he holding out on who to use it on in a life or death situation against someone who is a long term traveling companion?