When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
10 comments
Newest
OldestMost Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cultivation Clan
W7Admin 🐢
1 year ago
You just have to
Thoughtful person
1 year ago
They are both correct. They’re both living for what they believe in, and neither is particularly wrong, in my opinion anyway
Robin Ting
1 year ago
I think you guys are wrong. I think there is absolute good and evil. Doesn’t matter if the authorities define something harmful as good, if it is harmful it isn’t good. E.g: killing a serial killer to prevent more deaths, you did both good and bad, but if you really couldn’t solve the situation another way you wouldn’t be guilty though. But if you could restrain the killer but killed him on purpose, you’re guilty. That’s my understanding.
TheCatLord
2 years ago
The weird thing is, he’s not exactly wrong. Good and evil are just a manner of perception, what we classify as good or evil are what we learn from others as we get older. In the end there is no actual right answer, there’s just answers that most people prefer and when the majority believes in those answers they are considered the truth.
You just have to
They are both correct. They’re both living for what they believe in, and neither is particularly wrong, in my opinion anyway
I think you guys are wrong. I think there is absolute good and evil. Doesn’t matter if the authorities define something harmful as good, if it is harmful it isn’t good. E.g: killing a serial killer to prevent more deaths, you did both good and bad, but if you really couldn’t solve the situation another way you wouldn’t be guilty though. But if you could restrain the killer but killed him on purpose, you’re guilty. That’s my understanding.
The weird thing is, he’s not exactly wrong. Good and evil are just a manner of perception, what we classify as good or evil are what we learn from others as we get older. In the end there is no actual right answer, there’s just answers that most people prefer and when the majority believes in those answers they are considered the truth.
…this is cringy af