Hehe. Yeah, I noticed this before. Once the director isn’t there, everyone else’s ethics quickly deteriorate.
Of course, it’s obvious that even if they save the director now this way, Dostoyevsky will just manipulate them again to kill off any survivors and destroy the city. And it will be easier next time.
In fact, they only have his word that killing one of the hosts will save the other. Why would he tell the truth when he can just let both leaders die and kill off their people at the same time?
Hehe. Yeah, I noticed this before. Once the director isn’t there, everyone else’s ethics quickly deteriorate.
Of course, it’s obvious that even if they save the director now this way, Dostoyevsky will just manipulate them again to kill off any survivors and destroy the city. And it will be easier next time.
In fact, they only have his word that killing one of the hosts will save the other. Why would he tell the truth when he can just let both leaders die and kill off their people at the same time?